This study explores instances of Latin citation in late nineteenth- and
twentieth-century colonial writing (Kipling, Conrad and Orwell), and
then also in the postmodern/postcolonial work of Friel and Stoppard. The
thesis makes two interlocking cases: first there is the intertextual
case for how the investigation of Latin quotation in English texts on
the British Empire makes possible a reconsideration of those same
colonial or postcolonial texts, and of the value or interpretation they
place upon the colonial experience. Second there is the methodological
case for how the Latin quotations act as 'loopholes' within the text
which can be used to generate meanings against the grain. The thesis
makes important contributions to subfields within colonial discourse
analysis and postcolonial critique, expanding our understanding of
classical references within British imperial discourse and imperial
learning, of post/colonial irony, and of the intertextual values and
uses of citation.