Solow condemns the welfare reforms recently passed by Congress and
President Clinton for confronting welfare recipients with an unworkable
choice -- finding work in the current labor market or losing benefits.
He argues that the only practical and fair way to move recipients to
work is, in contrast, through an ambitious plan to guarantee that every
able-bodied citizen has access to a job. Solow contends that the demand
implicit in the 1996 Welfare Reform Act for welfare recipients to find
work in the existing labor market has two crucial flaws. Solow concludes
that it is legitimate to want welfare recipients to work, but not to
want them to live at a miserable standard or to benefit at the expense
of the working poor, especially since children are often the first to
suffer. Instead, he writes, we should create new demand for unskilled
labor through public-service employment and incentives to the private
sector - in effect, fair 'workfare.' Throughout, Solow places debate
over welfare reform in the context of a struggle to balance competing
social values, in particular self-reliance and altruism.