When the Civil War began, Northern soldiers and civilians alike sought a
framework to help make sense of the chaos that confronted them. Many
turned first to the classic European military texts from the Napoleonic
era, especially Antoine Henri Jomini's Summary of the Art of War. As
Carol Reardon shows, Jomini's work was only one voice in what ultimately
became a lively and contentious national discourse about how the North
should conduct war at a time when warfare itself was rapidly changing.
She argues that the absence of a strong intellectual foundation for the
conduct of war at its start--or, indeed, any consensus on the need for
such a foundation--ultimately contributed to the length and cost of the
conflict.
Reardon examines the great profusion of new or newly translated military
texts of the Civil War years intended to fill that intellectual void and
draws as well on the views of the soldiers and civilians who turned to
them in the search for a winning strategy. In examining how debates over
principles of military thought entered into the question of
qualifications of officers entrusted to command the armies of Northern
citizen soldiers, she explores the limitations of nineteenth-century
military thought in dealing with the human elements of combat.