In What's Law Got to Do With It?, the nation's top legal scholars and
political scientists examine to what extent the law actually shapes how
judges behave and make decisions, and what it means for society at
large.
Although there is a growing consensus among legal scholars and political
scientists, significant points of divergence remain. Contributors to
this book explore ways to reach greater accord on the complexity and
nuance of judicial decisionmaking and judicial elections, while
acknowledging that agreement on what judges do is not likely to occur
any time soon.
As the first forum in which political scientists and legal scholars
engage with one another on these hot button issues, this volume strives
to establish a true interdisciplinary conversation. The inclusion of
reactions from practicing judges puts into high relief the deep-seated
and opposing beliefs about the roles of law and politics in judicial
work.