First-year seminars have been widely hailed as a high-impact educational
practice, leading to improved academic performance, increased retention,
and achievement of critical 21st Century learning outcomes. While the
first-year seminar tends to be narrowly defined in the literature,
national explorations of course structure and administration underscore
the diversity of these curricular initiatives across and within
individual campuses. What then are the common denominators among these
highly variable courses that contribute to their educational
effectiveness?
This collection of case studies--representing a wide variety of
institutional and seminar types--addresses this question. Using Kuh and
O'Donnell's eight conditions of effective educational initiatives as a
framework, authors describe the structure, pedagogy, and assessment
strategies that lead to high-quality seminars. Introductory and
concluding essays examine the structural conditions that are likely to
support educational effectiveness in the seminar and describe the most
commonly reported conditions across all cases. What Makes the
First-Year Seminar High Impact? offers abundant models for ensuring the
delivery of a high-quality educational experience to entering students.