Does dialogue between faiths work? In its meta-framework painful issues
are raised with the hope of healing for both partners. This case study
asserts that this is vital if we wish to prevent a future HaShoah. After
fifty years, the Jewish-Christian dialogue has achieved respect and
trust, but basic disagreement over the Christian designation of Jesus as
the Jewish messiah stands. Is it possible to discuss this without
annihilating one or the other faith community? Theologians have
suggested varying approaches but none convince both partners, so this
work employs William James' radical empirical method to show that the
original Jewish messianic concept, the Christian shift, and the Jewish
repudiation of the shift, can each be seen as valid faith variants.