This ground-breaking and exhaustive analysis of university ranking
surveys scrutinizes their theoretical bases, methodological issues,
societal impact, and policy implications, providing readers with a deep
understanding of these controversial comparators. The authors propose
that university rankings are misused by policymakers and institutional
leaders alike. They assert that these interested parties overlook the
highly problematic internal logic of ranking methodologies even as they
obsess over the surveys' assessment of their status. The result is that
institutions suffer from short-termism, realigning their resources to
maximize their relative rankings. While rankings are widely used in
policy and academic discussions, this is the first book to explore the
theoretical and methodological issues of ranking itself. It is a welcome
contribution to an often highly charged debate. Far from showing how to
manipulate the system, this collection of work by key researchers aims
to enlighten interested parties.