BY G. W. LOCHER Some years ago, in a discussion of the modern concept of
structure, Levi-Strauss contended that the extraordinarily widespread
employment of the term "structure" since 1930 reflected a rediscovery of
the concept and the term rather than the continuation of a prior usage.
This assertion may be correct in general, but it does not apply to the N
ether- lands, at least nOlI: so far as the concept of structure is
concerned. The transmission of the concept in that country can in fact
be quite easily traced. It began in 1917 with the publication by van
Ossenbruggen of a study of the Javanese notion of montja-pat, l a paper
which was in- fluenced to a high degree by the famous monograph by
Durkheim and Mauss, "De quelques formes primitives de classification",
which had been published at the beginning of the century. 2 An even
clearer structural approach is to be found in the extensive Leiden
thesis of 3 W. H. Rassers, De Pandji-Roman. This dissertation itself
refers with particular emphasis to van Ossenbruggen's paper and to the
monograph by Durkheim and Mauss, as well as to various other
publications by them. The, studies later made by Rassers were also of
such a kind that when a collection of them was published in English in
1959, under the title Panji, The Culture Hero, 4 they were aptly
subtitled "A Structural Study of Religion in Java".