In Truth Without Paradox, David Johnson purports to solve several of the
traditional problems of metaphysics, pertaining to truth, logic,
similitude, morality, and God. In the first chapter, he argues (in three
independent ways) against the general acceptability of the schema 'if p
then it is true that p', claiming thereby to resolve the paradoxes of
the liar and of the sorites. In the second chapter, he clarifies what
was (and what was not) settled by Quine about truth by convention. In
the third chapter, he attempts to shed light on the obscure notion of
sameness, or uniformity, especially in its application to inductive
extrapolation and to the grue paradox. In the fourth chapter, he
purports to solve the Is/Ought problem of moral philosophy. The fifth
and final chapter, which will be of interest to philosophers of
religion, contains what the author calls an historical proof of the
existence of God, based on (among other things) a resolution of the
lottery paradox.