This work started with an overview of some of the origins of current
prevalent views and assumptions about the 'world'. The intention is,
however, to propose that although some of these worldviews are
widespread and in some senses modern, they are not axiomatic, not
universal. Some of these worldviews have formed the meta-theoretical
components of what can be termed mainstream Knowledge Management. it is
suggested that these meta-theories are characteristic of a period in
which they form part of a specific economic environment and wherein
certain characteristics of performance and commitment have become
necessary. Amongst others, economic goals may have somewhat displaced
some of our social or spiritual interests, and are sometimes represented
as the objective norm. In this light, we proposed that the main problem
with the current state of KM cannot be technically resolved because this
problem has its roots in some deep-rooted vales and assumptions about
the world, and it is argued that we should articulate some alternative
or even utopian understandings of KM.