The book's argument depends, as do most proposals in education, upon
cer- tain positions in the philosophy of education. I believe that
education should be primarily concerned with developing understanding,
with initiation into worth- while traditions of intellectual
achievement, and with developing capacities for clear, analytic and
critical thought. These have been the long-accepted goals of liberal
education. In a liberal education, students should come to know and
appre- ciate a variety of disciplines, know them at an appropriate
depth, see the interconnectedness of the disciplines, or the modes of
thought, and finally have some critical disposition toward what is being
learned, to be genuinely open- minded about intellectual things. These
liberal goals are contrasted with goals such as professional training,
job preparation, promotion of self-esteem, social engineering,
entertainment, or countless other putative purposes of schooling that
are enunciated by politicians, administrators, and educators. The book's
argument might be consistent with other views of education- especially
ones about the training of specialists (sometimes called a professional
view of education)-but the argument fits best with a liberal view of
education. The liberal hope has always been that if education is done
well, then other per- sonal and social goods will follow. The
development of informed, critical, and moral capacities is the
cornerstone for personal and social achievements.