ERICESPERET University of Poitiers, France Denis Alamargot and Lucile
Chanquoy's book offers a vivid and original presenta- tion of main
trends in the research field devoted to writing. First, it provides both
young and senior scientists with a comparative view of current
theoretical models of composition, with different levels of reading made
available: each element of these models is clearly situated in its
historical context, and scrutinized in its further evo- lution. Second,
this well documented theoretical analysis of writing mechanisms is
checked against empirical data extracted from a lot of updated
experimental studies; and lack of necessary data is thought to be
underlined and defined when noted. Following the usual description of
writing phases initially proposed by Hayes and Flower, the first part of
this book presents planning, translating and revision processes and
compares them to other researchers' conceptions (from Bereiter and
Scardamalia, to Kellogg or Galbraith). Such presentations of isolated
models do ex- ist in literature; but the present work really gives a
good comparative analysis of components inside each of models, in a
clear and cumulative way; a fine-grained ob- servation of differences
between similarly-looking models is also performed.