Shao-yun Yang challenges assumptions that the cultural and socioeconomic
watershed of the Tang-Song transition (800-1127 CE) was marked by a
xenophobic or nationalist hardening of ethnocultural boundaries in
response to growing foreign threats. In that period, reinterpretations
of Chineseness and its supposed antithesis, "barbarism," were not
straightforward products of political change but had their own
developmental logic based in two interrelated intellectual shifts among
the literati elite: the emergence of Confucian ideological and
intellectual orthodoxy and the rise of neo-Confucian (daoxue)
philosophy. New discourses emphasized the fluidity of the
Chinese-barbarian dichotomy, subverting the centrality of cultural or
ritual practices to Chinese identity and redefining the essence of
Chinese civilization and its purported superiority. The key issues at
stake concerned the acceptability of intellectual pluralism in a Chinese
society and the importance of Confucian moral values to the integrity
and continuity of the Chinese state. Through close reading of the
contexts and changing geopolitical realities in which new
interpretations of identity emerged, this intellectual history engages
with ongoing debates over relevance of the concepts of culture, nation,
and ethnicity to premodern China.