Today, statutes make up the bulk of the relevant law heard in federal
courts and arguably represent the most important source of American law.
The proper means of judicial interpretation of those statutes have been
the subject of great attention and dispute over the years. This book
provides new insights into the theory and practice of statutory
interpretation by courts.
Cross offers the first comprehensive analysis of statutory
interpretation and includes extensive empirical evidence of Supreme
Court practice. He offers a thorough review of the active disputes over
the appropriate approaches to statutory interpretations, namely whether
courts should rely exclusively on the text or also examine the
legislative history. The book then considers the use of these approaches
by the justices of the recent Rehnquist Court and the degree to which
they were applied by the justices, either sincerely or in pursuit of an
ideological agenda.