I am very pleased to have been asked to do abrief foreword to this
second CRISP volume, The Social Context o[ Coping. I know most of the
participants and their work, and respect them as first-rate and influen-
tial research scholars whose research is at the cusp of current concerns
in the field of stress and coping. Psychological stress is central to
human adaptation. It is difficult to visualize the study of adaptation,
health, illness, personal soundness, and psychopathology without
recognizing their dependence on how weil people cope with the stresses
of living. Since the editor, John Eckenrode, has portrayed the themes of
each of the chapters in his introduction, I can limit myself to a few
general comments about stress and coping. Stress research began, as
unexplored fields often do, with very sim- ple-should I say
simplistic?-ideas about how to define the concept. Early approaches were
unidimensional and input-output in outlook, modeled implicitly on
Hooke's late-17th-century engineering analysis in which external load
was an environmental stressor, stress was the area over wh ich the load
acted, and strain was the deformation of the struc- tu re such as a
bridge or building.