Stephen Turner has explored the ongms of social science in this
pioneering study of two nineteenth century themes: the search for laws
of human social behavior, and the accumulation and analysis of the facts
of such behavior through statistical inquiry. The disputes were
vigorously argued; they were over questions of method, criteria of
explanation, interpretations of probability, understandings of causation
as such and of historical causation in particular, and time and again
over the ways of using a natural science model. From his careful
elucidation of John Stuart Mill's proposals for the methodology of the
social sciences on to his original analysis of the methodological claims
and practices of Emile Durkheim and Max Weber, Turner has beautifully
traced the conflict between statistical sociology and a science
offactual description on the one side, and causal laws and a science of
nomological explanation on the other. We see the works of Comte and
Quetelet, the critical observations of Herschel, Buckle, Venn and
Whewell, and the tough scepticism of Pearson, all of these as essential
to the works of the classical founders of sociology. With Durkheim's
essay on Suicide and Weber's monograph on The Protestant Ethic, Turner
provides both philosophical analysis to demonstrate the continuing
puzzles over cause and probability and also a perceptive and wry account
of just how the puzzles of our late twentieth century are of a piece
with theirs. The terms are still familiar: reasons vs.