In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. New London that a city might
take property from one private owner and transfer it to another for
economic redevelopment. The ruling marked a new interpretation of the
Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, and set a precedent which has
raised significant questions regarding government takings and property
rights. The ruling also reawakened a public interest in private property
and created a vicious reaction among many citizens, journalists,
academics, and legislators. This book is unique because it offers an
in-depth analysis of the case law found in the opinions and decisions of
the state and federal courts, but also uses a variety of other sources
including the oral argument before the Supreme Court, the amicus curiae
briefs, American political and legal history, as well as the personal
stories of those involved in the case. This book also analyzes the
public backlash from several different perspectives including opinion
polls, media coverage, academic articles and commentary, subsequent case
law, and legislative action. Finally, this book offers an insightful
critique of the case, including what the Supreme Court got wrong, what
it got right, and where the law and courts should go from here.