At the center of the debate over complementary and alternative
medicine--from acupuncture and chiropractic treatments to homeopathy and
nutritional supplements--is how to scientifically measure the
effectiveness of a particular treatment. Fourteen scholars from the
fields of medicine, philosophy, sociology, and cultural and folklore
studies examine that debate, and the clash between growing public
support and the often hostile stance of clinicians and medical
researchers.
Proponents and critics have different methodologies and standards of
evidence--raising the question of how much pluralism is acceptable in a
medical context--particularly in light of differing worldviews and the
struggle to define medicine in the modern world. The contributors
address both the methodological problems of assessment and the
conflicting cultural perspectives at work in a patient's choice of
treatment. Sympathetic to CAM, the contributors nonetheless offer
careful critiques of its claims, and suggest a variety of ways it can be
taken seriously, yet subject to careful scrutiny.