No reader of professional journals, agency reports, or the daily press
needs to be told that Professors Gibelman and Demone have assembled a
vol- ume of contributions to a very lively debate. The two words
highlighted, "privatization" and "contracting," sum up the prescriptions
of many for social service reform and the anxieties of others who
question the new strategies. The pace and scale of developments over the
past 2 decades sometimes allows us to forget that the subject has a long
history. Privatization may be thought of as involving public turnover to
the private sector of responsi- bility for services it has been
delivering. Or it may be the public sector arranging for the private
sector to take on new services that the public wishes to encourage or
for which it accepts responsibility. The transaction usually involves
public funds. The historical story, however, is not one of public
temporal primacy.