By turns outlandish, humorous, and scatological, the Historia Augusta
is an eccentric compilation of biographies of the Roman emperors and
usurpers of the second and third centuries. Historians of late antiquity
have struggled to explain the fictional date and authorship of the work
and its bizarre content (did the Emperor Carinus really swim in pools of
floating apples and melons? did the usurper Proculus really deflower a
hundred virgins in fifteen days?). David Rohrbacher offers, instead, a
literary analysis of the work, focusing on its many playful allusions.
Marshaling an array of interdisciplinary research and original analysis,
he contends that the Historia Augusta originated in a circle of
scholarly readers with an interest in biography, and that its allusions
and parodies were meant as puzzles and jokes for a knowing and
appreciative audience.