This book seeks to explain why different systems of sovereign states
have built different types of fundamental institutions to govern
interstate relations. Why, for example, did the ancient Greeks operate a
successful system of third-party arbitration, while international
society today rests on a combination of international law and
multilateral diplomacy? Why did the city-states of Renaissance Italy
develop a system of oratorical diplomacy, while the states of absolutist
Europe relied on naturalist international law and "old diplomacy"?
Conventional explanations of basic institutional practices have
difficulty accounting for such variation. Christian Reus-Smit addresses
this problem by presenting an alternative, "constructivist" theory of
international institutional development, one that emphasizes the
relationship between the social identity of the state and the nature and
origin of basic institutional practices.
Reus-Smit argues that international societies are shaped by deep
constitutional structures that are based on prevailing beliefs about the
moral purpose of the state, the organizing principle of sovereignty, and
the norm of procedural justice. These structures inform the imaginations
of institutional architects as they develop and adjust institutional
arrangements between states. As he shows with detailed reference to
ancient Greece, Renaissance Italy, absolutist Europe, and the modern
world, different cultural and historical contexts lead to profoundly
different constitutional structures and institutional practices. The
first major study of its kind, this book is a significant addition to
our theoretical and empirical understanding of international relations,
past and present.