Sir Mark Hadley's aim in this book is to be frank rather than scholarly
about judging. The trial judge is in a very different position to the
appellate judge. The trial is where the facts are determined, and it is
essentially a trial judge who exercises the powers of discretion which
modern society increasingly vests in its judiciary. As society becomes
more complex, so does the law. However, law cannot provide for every
circumstance and so its application often involves the exercise of
discretion. Criminal sentencing, child welfare, the protection of those
who lack mental capacity, and disputes about medical treatment are
obvious examples. How do judges go about that? How far are judges
influenced or affected by their backgrounds, beliefs, and own life
experiences? And, if consistency is an aspect of public justice, can
that be achieved? And what about the conflict between public justice and
personal privacy? These are pressing questions in a society where judges
have greater effective power than ever before. [Subject: Family Law,
Judicial History]