The member states are facing the choice between either reaping the
benefits of increasing integration in a certain area - in this case the
capital markets - attended by a significant reduction in national powers
of autonomous decision-making and independence, or retaining this
national independence enabling them to pursue their own policy
objectives with the aid of instruments selected at their discretion. To
this question, there is no generally valid answer. The solution is
determined by the weight assigned to the benefits, on the one hand, and
that assigned to the reduction in national sovereignty, on the other.
This, however, is a subjective matter, which is assessed differently in
the various countries. OnnoRuding, 1969 1. 1 CAPITAL LffiERALIZATION AND
MONETARY UNIFICATION In the 1980s Europe made a leap forward towards the
liberalization of capital movements. EEC directives were accepted by all
member states obliging them to abolish all remaining exchange controls.
This common objective of freedom of capital movements has been
consolidated in the Treaty on European Union. Nowadays virtually all
restrictions have been lifted. This stands in striking contrast to the
state of affairs only a decade ago, when many countries still operated a
tight regime. Although the Treaty of Rome provided for the freedom of
capital movements, this objective was circumscribed by the clause that
such liberalization should only be carried through to the extent
necessary to ensure the proper functioning of the Common Market.