Pulling the rug out from debates about interpretation, The Language of
Statutes joins together learning from law, linguistics, and cognitive
science to illuminate the fundamental issues and problems in this highly
contested area. Here, Lawrence M. Solan argues that statutory
interpretation is alive, well, and not in need of the major overhaul
that many have suggested. Rather, he suggests, the majority of people
understand their rights and obligations most of the time, with difficult
cases occurring in circumstances that we can predict from understanding
when our minds do not work in a lawlike way.
Solan explains that these cases arise because of the gap between our
inability to write crisp yet flexible laws on one hand and the ways in
which our cognitive and linguistic faculties are structured on the
other. Making our lives easier and more efficient, we're predisposed to
absorb new situations into categories we have previously formed--but in
the legislative and judicial realms this can present major difficulties.
Solan provides an excellent introduction to statutory interpretation,
rejecting the extreme arguments that judges have either too much or too
little leeway, and explaining how and why a certain number of
interpretive problems are simply inevitable.