This theoretical contribution argues that the domination of Western
knowledge in disaster scholarship has allowed normative policies and
practices of disaster risk reduction to be imposed all over the world.
It takes a postcolonial approach to unpack why scholars claim that
disasters are social constructs while offering little but theories,
concepts and methods supposed to be universal in understanding the
unique and diverse experiences of millions of people across very
different cultures. It further challenges forms of governments inherited
from the Enlightenment that have been rolled out as standard and
ultimate solutions to reduce the risk of disaster. Ultimately, the book
encourages the emergence of a more diverse set of world views/senses and
ways of knowing for both studying disasters and informing policy and
practice of disaster risk reduction. Such pluralism is essential to
better reflect local realities of what disasters actually are around the
world.
This book is an essential read for scholars and postgraduate students
interested in disaster studies as well as policy-makers and
practitioners of disaster risk reduction.