The advancement of psychoanalysis in America has reached an impasse.
Scientists are pitted against hermeneuticists, theorists against
practitioners, and narrative truth against historical truth, reflecting
and refracting the role of the past in theory and therapy through a host
of competing approaches. Leonard Lamm argues against the impossible task
of unifying psychoanalysis into a homogenous discourse, proposing
instead the acceptance of a pluralist model in which different modes of
discourse are applicable and appropriate in different circumstances.
This innovative work sets out to unravel the opaque idea of the
psychoanalytic past as expressed in countless theoretical voices, from
object relations to Lacanianism to ego psychology. Dr. Lamm redraws the
map of American psychoanalytic argument and takes a fresh look at
current debates on narrative truth, metapsychology, and the role of the
past in psychoanalysis.
A thoughtful model emerges in which historical, scientific, and
practical discourses and constructions of the past do not compose a
hierarchy in psychoanalytic understanding. Instead, they are voices in a
conversation in which they may differ without disagreeing.