Much of our knowledge of the cerebral circulation has been derived from
studies of species other than human. There is increas- ing recognition
of species differences and concern that studies in animals may be
misleading if unquestioningly applied to the human. A dramatic example
of this occurred in the early his- tory of the study of the circulation
of the brain. Galen of Pergamo (131-201 AD) described a rete mirabile or
"marvelous network" of blood vessels at the base of the human skull that
he must have derived from observations of certain animals. This vascular
structure was supplied by the carotid arteries which, after penetrating
the cranium,"are divided into a large number of very small and thin
branches in the region between the cranium and the dura matter. Then . .
. intersecting one another they give the impression of having forgotten
their way in the brain. But this is not the case. In fact, these
numerous arteries rejoin and unite like the roots of a tree trunk. . . .
" The authority of Galen's writings dominated scientific thought for
about 1500 years. His description of a rete was unques- tioned by
Leonardo de Vinci, who included it in his anatomical sketches. William
Harvey's remarkable observations led to his definitive account of the
circulation of blood.