The First Amendment -and its guarantee of free speech for all
Americans-has been at the center of scholarly and public debate since
the birth of the Constitution, and the fervor in which intellectuals,
politicians, and ordinary citizens approach the topic shows no sign of
abating as the legal boundaries and definitions of free speech are
continually evolving and facing new challenges. Such discussions have
generally remained within the boundaries of the U.S. Constitution and
its American context, but consideration of free speech in other
industrial democracies can offer valuable insights into the relationship
between free speech and democracy on a larger and more global scale,
thereby shedding new light on some unexamined (and untested) assumptions
that underlie U.S. free speech doctrine. Ronald Krotoszynski compares
the First Amendment with free speech law in Japan, Canada, Germany, and
the United Kingdom-countries that are all considered modern democracies
but have radically different understandings of what constitutes free
speech. Challenging the popular-and largely American-assertion that free
speech is inherently necessary for democracy to thrive, Krotoszynski
contends that it is very difficult to speak of free speech in
universalist terms when the concept is examined from a framework of
comparative law that takes cultural difference into full account. Ronald
J. Krotoszynski, Jr. is professor of law and alumni faculty fellow at
Washington and Lee University School of Law in Lexington, Virginia. He
is co-author of Administrative Law.