Barbara Johnson investigates the significant and illuminating ways in
which both literature and criticism are "critically different" from what
they purport to be. Her subtle and provocative studies of Balzac,
Mallarme, Baudelaire, Apollinaire, Melville, Poe, Barthes, Lacan,
Austin, and Derrida take a refreshing new approach to the fundamental
questions of meaning, interpretation, and the relationship between
literature and criticism.
In each of seven essays, a clear, precise, and detailed reading of the
rhetoric of one or more literary or critical works reveals the text's
fundamental discrepancies, ambiguities, and contradictions. If rhetoric
is seen as language's capacity to differ from literal statement, and if
"to differ" can also mean "to disagree, " then the reading of the
rhetoric of literature and theory here is an attempt to capture the
logic of a text's own disagreement with itself.