Thucydides, the patron saint of Realpolitik, continues to be read in
many fields outside of classics. Why did his History succeed in setting
the pattern for future scholars where Hereodotus's earlier Histories
failed? In this fascinating study of the construction of intellectual
authority, Gregory Crane argues that Thucydides was successful for two
reasons. First, he refined the language of administration: Who was in
charge? How much money was spent? How many people were killed? Second,
he drew upon the abstract philosophical rhetoric developing in the fifth
century, one in which the state and the public, rather than the family
and the individual, stand at the center of the world. Ironically, it was
through deeply personal alliances that aristocratic Greeks had defined
themselves and exerted power. Thucydides's discursive practice was
therefore fundamentally incompatible with his ideological goals.