David Herrmann's work is the most complete study to date of how
land-based military power influenced international affairs during the
series of diplomatic crises that led up to the First World War. Instead
of emphasizing the naval arms race, which has been extensively studied
before, Herrmann draws on documentary research in military and state
archives in Germany, France, Austria, England, and Italy to show the
previously unexplored effects of changes in the strength of the European
armies during this period. Herrmann's work provides not only a
contribution to debates about the causes of the war but also an account
of how the European armies adopted the new weaponry of the twentieth
century in the decade before 1914, including quick-firing artillery,
machine guns, motor transport, and aircraft. In a narrative account that
runs from the beginning of a series of international crises in 1904
until the outbreak of the war, Herrmann points to changes in the balance
of military power to explain why the war began in 1914, instead of at
some other time. Russia was incapable of waging a European war in the
aftermath of its defeat at the hands of Japan in 1904-5, but in 1912,
when Russia appeared to be regaining its capacity to fight, an
unprecedented land- armaments race began. Consequently, when the July
crisis of 1914 developed, the atmosphere of military competition made
war a far more likely outcome than it would have been a decade earlier.