The 1989 Annual Meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis dramatically
demonstrated one of the most important reasons for having the Society -
to bring together people with highly diverse backgrounds and disciplines
to assess the common problems of societal and individual risks. The
physical scientists emphasized the analytical tools for assessing
environmental effects and for modeling risks from engineered systems and
other human activities. The health scientists presented numerous methods
of analyzing health effects, including the subject of dose-response
relationships, especially at low exposure levels - never an easy
analysis. The social and political scientists concentrated on issues of
risk perception, communication, acceptability, and human touch. Others
discussed such issues as cost-benefit analysis and the risk-based
approach to decision analysis. Use of risk assessment methods for risk
management continued to be a matter of strong opinion and debate. The
impacts of state and federal regulations, existing and planned, were
assessed in sessions and in luncheon speeches. These impacts show that
risk analysis practitioners will have an increasingly important role in
the future. They will be challenged to provide clear, easily understood
evaluations of risk that are responsive to society's concern for risk,
as evidenced in laws and regulations. Of course, the various risk
analysis specialties overlapped in domains of interest.