What should literature with political aims look like? This book traces
two rival responses to this question, one prizing clarity and the other
confusion, which have dominated political aesthetics since the late
nineteenth century. Revisiting recurrences of the avant-garde
experimentalism versus critical realism debates from the twentieth
century, Geoffrey A. Baker highlights the often violent reductions at
work in earlier debates. Instead of prizing one approach over the other,
as many participants in those debates have done, Baker focuses on the
manner in which the debate itself between these approaches continues to
prove productive and enabling for politically engaged writers. This book
thus offers a way beyond the simplistic polarity of realism vs.
anti-realism in a study that is focused on influential strands of
thought in England, France, and Germany and that covers well-known
authors such as Zola, Nietzsche, Arnold, Mann, Brecht, Sartre, Adorno,
Lukács, Beauvoir, Morrison, and Coetzee.