This timely intervention into composition studies presents a case for
the need to teach all students a shared system of communication and
logic based on the modern globalizing ideals of universality,
neutrality, and empiricism.
Based on a series of close readings of contemporary writing by Stanley
Fish, Asao Inoue, Doug Downs and Elizabeth Wardle, Richard Rorty, Slavoj
Zizek, and Steven Pinker, this book critiques recent arguments that
traditional approaches to teaching writing, grammar, and argumentation
foster marginalization, oppression, and the restriction of student
agency. Instead, it argues that the best way to educate and empower a
diverse global student body is to promote a mode of academic discourse
dedicated to the impartial judgment of empirical facts communicated in
an open and clear manner. It provides a critical analysis of core topics
in composition studies, including the teaching of grammar; notions of
objectivity and neutrality; empiricism and pragmatism; identity
politics; and postmodernism.
Aimed at graduate students and junior instructors in rhetoric and
composition, as well as more seasoned scholars and program
administrators, this polemical book provides an accessible staging of
key debates that all writing instructors must grapple with.