Almost everywhere in the world housing policies play an important role
in government programs. Especially in the industrialized Western
economies housing policy issues are triggered mainly by two
developments: growing population density and increasing environmental
pollution enforce a systematic planning of regional and urban
development; all social groups want to participate in the increasing
welfare of the domestic economies; until today housing policy is
considered an appropriate tool for redistribution and social policy.
Taxation serves as an important instrument for the realization of the
political objectives mentioned above. Surprisingly, there exists
wide-spread consent (even on the academic side) on the effectivity of
this instrument. However, strictly speaking this consent concerns only
the short run. Long-term effects are usually ignored. Therefore, there
is always the inherent risk in these policies that (supposed) market
inefficiencies will not be cured, but merely carried forward, and
possibly amplified. Moreover, it is characteristic for the political
discussion that there is no consistent notion of what efficient housing
and land markets ought to look like. Generally accepted for example, is
the position that land speculation should be fought whereever possible.
Hardly anyone asks the question whether the holding of building land
will be beneficial to the economy as a whole, and not only to the
speculant.