Interpreting statistical data as evidence, Statistical Evidence: A
Likelihood Paradigm focuses on the law of likelihood, fundamental to
solving many of the problems associated with interpreting data in this
way. Statistics has long neglected this principle, resulting in a
seriously defective methodology. This book redresses the balance,
explaining why science has clung to a defective methodology despite its
well-known defects. After examining the strengths and weaknesses of the
work of Neyman and Pearson and the Fisher paradigm, the author proposes
an alternative paradigm which provides, in the law of likelihood, the
explicit concept of evidence missing from the other paradigms. At the
same time, this new paradigm retains the elements of objective
measurement and control of the frequency of misleading results, features
which made the old paradigms so important to science. The likelihood
paradigm leads to statistical methods that have a compelling rationale
and an elegant simplicity, no longer forcing the reader to choose
between frequentist and Bayesian statistics.