When the Act of Union was passed in 1707, Scottish parliament was
dissolved and the nation's capital became London. While the general
public balked at the perceived unfairness of the treaty, the majority of
Scottish ministers seemed satisfied with its terms. This book offers an
explanation of how that outcome came about. By examining the influence
of a particular strain of mercantilist thought, Ramos demonstrates how
the negotiations preceding the passage of the Act of Union were shaped
by ideas of value, wealth, trade and power, and, accordingly, how the
model of positive balance was used to justify the necessity of the Act.
Utilizing contemporary evidence from the English and Scottish ministers
involved, this book explores alternative arguments regarding the Union,
from before 1707 and in early Scottish political economy, thus
highlighting the differing economic and political views that have
persisted between England and Scotland for centuries. With twenty-first
century discontent leading to the Scottish independence referendum and
arguments that persist in the wake of the Brexit decision, Ramos
produces timely research that investigates ideas of protectionism that
feed into mercantilist economic thought.