The last two decades have witnessed a profound change in the way we
receive the literary texts of early modern England. One could call this
a move from 'text' to 'culture'. Put briefly, earlier critics tended to
focus on literary texts, strictly conceived: plays, poems, prose
fictions, essays. Since the mid-1980s, however, it has been just as
likely for critics to speak of the 'culture' of early modern England,
even when they do so in conjunction with analysis of literary texts.
This 'cultural turn' has clearly enriched the way in which we read the
texts of early modern England, but the interdisciplinary practices
involved have frequently led critics to make claims about materials -
and about the 'culture' these materials appear to embody - that exceed
those materials' representativeness. Shakespeare and the Question of
Culture addresses the central issue of 'culture' in early modern studies
through both literary history and disciplinary critique. Douglas Bruster
argues that the 'culture' literary critiques investigate through the
works of Shakespeare and other writers is largely a literary culture,
and he examines what this necessary limitation of the scope of 'cultural
studies' means for the discipline of early modern studies.