Within the study of drama, the question of how to relate text and
performance--and what interpretive tools are best suited to analyzing
them--is a longstanding and contentious one. Most scholars agree that
reading a printed play is a means of dramatic realization absolutely
unlike live performance, but everything else beyond this premise is
contestable: how much authority to assign to playwrights, the extent to
which texts and readings determine performance, and the capability of
printed plays to communicate the possibilities of performance. Without
denying that printed plays distort and fragment performance practice,
this book negotiates an intractable debate by shifting attention to the
ways in which these inevitable distortions can nevertheless enrich a
reader's awareness of a play's performance potentialities. As author J.
Gavin Paul demonstrates, printed plays can be more meaningfully engaged
with actual performance than is typically assumed, via specific
editorial principles and strategies. Focusing on the long history of
Shakespearean editing, he develops the concept of the
performancescape: a textual representation of performance potential
that gives relative shape and stability to what is dynamic and
multifarious.