Employing methodological perspectives from the fields of political
geography, environmental studies, anthropology, and their cognate
disciplines, this volume explores alternative logics of sentient
landscapes as racist, xenophobic, and right-wing. While the field of
sentient landscapes has gained critical attention, the literature rarely
seems to question the intentionality of sentient landscapes, which are
often romanticized as pure, good, and just, and perceived as protectors
of those who are powerless, indigenous, and colonized. The book takes a
new stance on sentient landscapes with the intention of dispelling the
denial of "coevalness" represented by their scholarly romanticization.