It is Sunday, the 7th of September 1930. The place is Konigsberg and the
occasion is a small conference on the foundations of mathematics. Arend
Heyting, the foremost disciple of L. E. J. Brouwer, has spoken on
intuitionism; Rudolf Carnap of the Vienna Circle has expounded on
logicism; Johann (formerly Janos and in a few years to be Johnny) von
Neumann has explained Hilbert's proof theory-- the so-called formalism;
and Hans Hahn has just propounded his own empiricist views of
mathematics. The floor is open for general discussion, in the midst of
which Heyting announces his satisfaction with the meeting. For him, the
relationship between formalism and intuitionism has been clarified:
There need be no war between the intuitionist and the formalist. Once
the formalist has successfully completed Hilbert's programme and shown
"finitely" that the "idealised" mathematics objected to by Brouwer
proves no new "meaningful" statements, even the intuitionist will fondly
embrace the infinite. To this euphoric revelation, a shy young man
cautions "According to the formalist conception one adjoins to the
meaningful statements of mathematics transfinite (pseudo-')statements
which in themselves have no meaning but only serve to make the system a
well-rounded one just as in geometry one achieves a well- rounded system
by the introduction of points at infinity.