What prompted southern secession in the winter of 1860-61 and why did
secession culminate in the American Civil War?
Politicians and opinion leaders on both sides of the Mason-Dixon line
struggled to formulate coherent responses to the secession of the deep
South states. The Confederate attack on Fort Sumter in mid-April 1861
triggered civil war and the loss of four upper South states from the
Union. The essays by three senior historians in Secession Winter
explore the robust debates that preceded these events.
For five months in the winter of 1860-1861, Americans did not know for
certain that civil war was upon them. Some hoped for a compromise;
others wanted a fight. Many struggled to understand what was happening
to their country. Robert J. Cook, William L. Barney, and Elizabeth R.
Varon take approaches to this period that combine political, economic,
and social-cultural lines of analysis. Rather than focus on whether
civil war was inevitable, they look at the political process of
secession and find multiple internal divisions--political parties,
whites and nonwhites, elites and masses, men and women. Even individual
northerners and southerners suffered inner conflicts.
The authors include the voices of Unionists and Whig party moderates who
had much to lose and upcountry folk who owned no slaves and did not
particularly like those who did. Barney contends that white southerners
were driven to secede by anxiety and guilt over slavery. Varon takes a
new look at Robert E. Lee's decision to join the Confederacy. Cook
argues that both northern and southern politicians claimed the rightness
of their cause by constructing selective narratives of historical
grievances.
Secession Winter explores the fact of contingency and reminds readers
and students that nothing was foreordained.
