"If a science has to be supported by fraudulent means, let it perish. "
With these words of Kepler, Agassi plunges into the actual troubles and
glories of science (321). The SOciology of science is no foreign
intruder upon scientific knowledge in these essays, for we see clearly
how Agassi transforms the tired internalistJexternalist debate about the
causal influences in the history of science. The social character of the
entire intertwined epistemological and practical natures of the sciences
is intrinsic to science and itself split: the internal sociology within
science, the external sociology of the social setting without. Agassi
sees these social matters in the small as well as the large: from the
details of scientific communication, changing publishing as he thinks to
'on-demand' centralism with less waste (Ch. 12), to the colossal tension
of romanticism and rationality in the sweep of historical cultures.
Agassi is a moral and political philosopher of science, defending, dis-
turbing, comprehending, criticizing. For him, science in a society
requires confrontation, again and again, with issues of autonomy vs.
legitimation as the central problem of democracy. And furthermore,
devotion to science, pace Popper, Polanyi, and Weber, carries
preoccupational dangers: Popper's elitist rooting out of
'pseudo-science', Weber's hard-working obsessive . com- mitment to
science. See Agassi's Weberian gloss on the social psychology of science
in his provocative 'picture of the scientist as maniac' (437).