Until recently, struggles for justice proceeded against the background
of a taken-for-granted frame: the bounded territorial state. With that
"Westphalian" picture of political space assumed by default, the scope
of justice was rarely subject to open dispute. Today, however,
human-rights activists and international feminists join critics of
structural adjustment and the World Trade Organization in challenging
the view that justice can only be a domestic relation among fellow
citizens. Targeting injustices that cut across borders, they are making
the scale of justice an object of explicit struggle.
Inspired by these efforts, Nancy Fraser asks: What is the proper frame
for theorizing justice? Faced with a plurality of competing scales, how
do we know which one is truly just? In exploring these questions, Fraser
revises her widely discussed theory of redistribution and recognition.
She introduces a third, "political" dimension of justice&
mdash;representation& mdash;and elaborates a new, reflexive type of
critical theory that foregrounds injustices of "misframing." Engaging
with thinkers such as Jürgen Habermas, John Rawls, Michel Foucault, and
Hannah Arendt, she envisions a "postwestphalian" mapping of political
space that accommodates transnational solidarity, transborder publicity,
and democratic frame-setting, as well as emancipatory projects that
cross borders. The result is a sustained reflection on who should count
with respect to what in a globalizing world.