It has been close to six decades since Watson and Crick discovered the
structure of DNA and more than ten years since the human genome was
decoded. Today, through the collection and analysis of a small blood
sample, every baby born in the United States is screened for more than
fifty genetic disorders. Though the early detection of these
abnormalities can potentially save lives, the test also has a high
percentage of false positives--inaccurate results that can take a brutal
emotional toll on parents before they are corrected. Now some doctors
are questioning whether the benefits of these screenings outweigh the
stress and pain they sometimes produce. In Saving Babies?, Stefan
Timmermans and Mara Buchbinder evaluate the consequences and benefits of
state-mandated newborn screening--and the larger policy questions they
raise about the inherent inequalities in American medical care that
limit the effectiveness of this potentially lifesaving technology.
Drawing on observations and interviews with families, doctors, and
policy actors, Timmermans and Buchbinder have given us the first
ethnographic study of how parents and geneticists resolve the many
uncertainties in screening newborns. Ideal for scholars of medicine,
public health, and public policy, this book is destined to become a
classic in its field.