This book explores the changing perspective of astrology from the Middle
Ages to the Early Modern Era. It introduces a framework for
understanding both its former centrality and its later removal from
legitimate knowledge and practice. The discussion reconstructs the
changing roles of astrology in Western science, theology, and culture
from 1250 to 1500.
The author considers both the how and the why. He analyzes and
integrates a broad range of sources. This analysis shows that the
history of astrology--in particular, the story of the protracted
criticism and ultimate removal of astrology from the realm of legitimate
knowledge and practice--is crucial for fully understanding the
transition from premodern Aristotelian-Ptolemaic natural philosophy to
modern Newtonian science.
This removal, the author argues, was neither obvious nor unproblematic.
Astrology was not some sort of magical nebulous hodge-podge of beliefs.
Rather, astrology emerged in the 13th century as a richly mathematical
system that served to integrate astronomy and natural philosophy,
precisely the aim of the "New Science" of the 17th century. As such, it
becomes a fundamentally important historical question to determine why
this promising astrological synthesis was rejected in favor of a rather
different mathematical natural philosophy--and one with a very different
causal structure than Aristotle's.