This research submits that for the purposes of making victims'
participation to the ICC proceedings more efficient, the victims' status
could be raised to a status similar to that of partie civile common in
civil law jurisdictions. However such status should be limited to
victims who are ready to take the solemn oath and who accept to be
cross-examined and who understand that should they give false evidence
to the Court, they would become subject to criminal proceedings for
attempt to subvert the Court's administration of justice. Furthermore
the Chamber should have the discretion to grant such status to any
victim it deems fit according to the relevance of submissions they
intend to make. It further submits that whereas criminal proceedings
should remain the focus of their primary mission which is establishing
guilt, the reparation mechanism should be victim centered. Indeed one
may be tempted to advocate for a reparation system which is less
judicial even when such mechanism might remain within the ICC auspices;
the mechanism should rather be more restorative, thus leaning more
towards mechanisms available under transitional justice.