Neoclassical growth theory is the dominant perspective for explaining
economic growth. At its core are four implicit assumptions: 1) economic
output can become decoupled from energy consumption; 2) economic
distribution is unrelated to growth; 3) large institutions are not
important for growth; and 4) labor force structure is not important for
growth. Drawing on a wide range of data from the economic history of the
United States, this book tests the validity of these assumptions and
finds no empirical support. Instead, connections are found between the
growth in energy consumption and such disparate phenomena as economic
redistribution, corporate employment concentration, and changing labor
force structure. The integration of energy into an economic growth model
has the potential to offer insight into the future effects of fossil
fuel depletion on key macroeconomic indicators, which is already
manifested in stalled or diminished growth and escalating debt in many
national economies. This book argues for an alternative, biophysical
perspective to the study of growth, and presents a set of "stylized
facts" that such an approach must successfully explain. Aspects of
biophysical analysis are combined with differential monetary analysis to
arrive at a unique empirical methodology for investigating the elements
and dependencies of the economic growth process.