Outside of randomized experiments, association does not imply causation,
and yet there is nothing defective about our knowledge that smoking
causes lung cancer, a conclusion reached in the absence of randomized
experimentation with humans. How is that possible? If observed
associations do not identify causal effects in observational studies,
how can a sequence of such associations become decisive?
Two or more associations may each be susceptible to unmeasured biases,
yet not susceptible to the same biases. An observational study has two
evidence factors if it provides two comparisons susceptible to different
biases that may be combined as if from independent studies of different
data by different investigators, despite using the same data twice. If
the two factors concur, then they may exhibit greater insensitivity to
unmeasured biases than either factor exhibits on its own.
Replication and Evidence Factors in Observational Studies includes
four parts:
- A concise introduction to causal inference, making the book
self-contained
- Practical examples of evidence factors from the health and social
sciences with analyses in R
- The theory of evidence factors
- Study design with evidence factors
A companion R package evident is available from CRAN.