The Supreme Court's recent decision in Knick v. Township of Scott has
been aptly described by some commentators as the most significant
property rights case of the last decade. In Knick, the Court found the
regulatory takings claim, which had not yet been denied compensation in
state court, was ripe nonetheless. In doing so, the Court explicitly
overturned the second prong of the so-called Williamson County ripeness
test that required property owners to seek a remedy through state action
-- usually just compensation -- for the alleged taking before coming to
federal court.
The elements of these exceptions are explained in great detail in
separate chapters. Understanding these exceptions is critical to
litigating about land use regulations for such as open space,
agriculture, and preservation/conservation where the subject land is
left without any economic use. If the exceptions apply, the landowner
gets no compensation. If the exceptions do not apply, the landowner
prevails.